Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11667/118
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorRafetseder, Eva-
dc.contributor.otherAustrian Science Funden_GB
dc.coverage.spatialSalzburg (Austria)en_GB
dc.coverage.spatialStirling (Scotland)en_GB
dc.creatorPriewasser, Beate-
dc.creatorRafetseder, Eva-
dc.creatorGargitter, Carina-
dc.creatorPerner, Josef-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-05T11:09:45Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-05T11:09:45Z-
dc.date.created2014-02-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11667/118-
dc.description.abstractDataset 1 is a straight replication of the original true and false belief conditions in Buttelmann, Carpenter and Tomasello (2009). Materials were produced according to the description in Buttelmann et al. (2009) and we videotaped our procedure and received written feedback from the first author (David Buttelmann). Overall, 45 children between 18 and 32 months (Mage=24.47, SD=4.08, 20 girls) participated in the study. The age range was chosen to cover the range between BCT’s youngest in their sample of 18 month olds in Study 2 and their oldest in Study 1. Data were collected in the Theory of mind Child Lab of the University of Salzburg (n=20), the Parent-Toddler Group of the University of Stirling, (n=17) and in the Little Stars Nursery (n=8). Seventeen children had to be excluded because of parental/teacher error (3), fussiness (10), unclear responses (2), or because they did not respond to any helping request by opening or at least touching one of the boxes (2). The main finding in our study shows that children were more likely to help find a toy in the false belief than in the true belief condition. The data do not clearly speak against the null-hypothesis.en_GB
dc.description.tableofcontentsDataset 1, Excel spreadsheeten_GB
dc.language.isoengen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirling. Faculty of Natural Sciences.en_GB
dc.relationPriewasser, B; Refetseder, E; Gargitter, C; Perner, J (2018): Helping as an early indicator of a theory of mind: mentalism or teleology? Dataset 1. University of Stirling, School of Natural Sciences. Dataset. http://hdl.handle.net/11667/118en_GB
dc.relation.isreferencedbyPriewasser, B., Rafetseder, E., Gargitter, C. and Perner, J. (2018) Helping as an early indicator of a theory of mind: Mentalism or Teleology?. Cognitive Development, 46, pp. 69-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.08.002. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/25791en_GB
dc.rightsRights covered by the standard CC-BY 4.0 licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dc.subjectTheory of Minden_GB
dc.subjectHelping paradigmen_GB
dc.subjectReplicationen_GB
dc.subjectTeleologyen_GB
dc.subjectEarly false belief understandingen_GB
dc.subject.classification:Psychology::Developmental psychologyen_GB
dc.titleHelping as an early indicator of a theory of mind: mentalism or teleology?: Dataset 1en_GB
dc.typedataseten_GB
dc.contributor.emaileva.rafetseder@stir.ac.uken_GB
dc.identifier.projectidI637–G15en_GB
dc.title.projectRule-Understanding, subjective preferences, and social display rulesen_GB
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirling (Psychology)en_GB
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Salzburgen_GB
dc.date.publicationyear2018en_GB
Appears in Collections:University of Stirling Research Data

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Data Set 1.xlsx13.59 kBMicrosoft Excel XMLView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in DataSTORRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.